Where's There's Smoke, There's Fire.

I have been interested in conspiracies for many years now. It's not because of some sort of paranoia, it's not an attempt to explain inconsistencies by using the same sort of smoke and mirrors tactics a mystic relies on, nor is it an attempt to appear to have some sort of insider information. The definition of “conspiracy” is as follows from dictionary.com:

1)the act of conspiring.

2)an evil,unlawful,treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons;plot.

3)a combination of persons for a secret,unlawful, or evil purpose:He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.

4)Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.

5)any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

There are many, many synonyms that are used to describe a conspiracy and they are listed on the same website mentioned above as:

1. collusion, sedition. 2. Conspiracy, plot, intrigue, cabal all refer to surreptitious or covert schemes to accomplish some end, most often an evil one. A conspiracy usually involves a group entering into a secret agreement to achieve some illicit or harmful objective: a vicious conspiracy to control prices. A plot is a carefully planned secret scheme, usually by a small number of persons, to secure sinister ends: a plot to seize control of a company. An intrigue usually involves duplicity and deceit aimed at achieving either personal advantage or criminal or treasonous objectives: the petty intrigues of civil servants. Cabal refers either to a plan by a small group of highly-placed persons to overthrow or control a government, or to the group of persons themselves: a cabal of powerful lawmakers.

So “conspiracy” is a legitimate word with legitimate value because it is absolutely exists. We see it everyday and only accept what our thought processes have been conditioned to accept as reasonable. We as a people, are given unwritten, non-verifiable, acceptable parameters as to what a “legitimate” conspiracy is. We hear words and phrases like “sham”, “racket”, “cover up”, “scandal”, “scam” and “scheme”. These clearly define “conspiracy”, yet we don't actually use the word “conspiracy”. I suspect this is another Orwellian tactic to change the popular definition from the actual definition of “conspiracy”. You see, our lexicon keeps getting smaller. As our lexicon shrinks, our capability to reason and comprehend is also reduced.

The idea is to associate the word “conspiracy” with another word, ... “theory”. The Ministry of Truth (will be referred to as MoT – this is also interchangeable with Ministry of Propaganda - MoP ) with the help of the talking heads that are so popular today, have sent these two words to the realm of mental instability. That's right! The MoP has enlisted the help television networks to help you understand what truly reasonable and sophisticated people should think. Let's look at the classical definition of the word “theory” from again, dictionary.com:

1)a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.

2)a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.

3)Mathematics . a body of principles, theorems, or the like,belonging to one subject: number theory.

4)the branch of a science or art that deals with its principles or methods,as distinguished from its practice: music theory.

5)a particularconception or view of something to be done or of the methodof doing it; a system of rules or principles.

6)contemplation ors peculation.

7)guess or conjecture.

The synonyms for theory is:

1. Theory, hypothesis are used in non-technical contexts to mean an untested idea or opinion. A theory in technical use is a more or less verified or established explanation accounting for known facts or phenomena: the theory of relativity. A hypothesis is a conjecture put forth as a possible explanation of phenomena or relations, which serves as a basis of argument or experimentation to reach the truth:This idea is only a hypothesis.

In other words, a “theory” is an unproven idea. The MoP's mission then, is to destroy the credibility and/or reputation, or mock and ridicule anyone who looks for different explanations than the ones that are politically cleansed for public consumption. For the sake of objectivity, let's look again at dictionary.com and read what it's definition of “conspiracy theory” is:

1)a theory that explains an event as being the result of a plot by a covert group or organization; a belief that a particular unexplained event was caused by such a group.

2)the idea that many important political events or economic and social trends are the products of secret plots that are largely unknown to the general public.

Interestingly enough, there is no mention in these two definitions about mental instability. So, does the legitimate questioning of “official” stories automatically equate mental instability? I don't believe it does. For example, let's recall an event that came to a head on November 3, 1986. It was the Iran-Contra scandal (conspiracy). This is a well known event that no one questions. Yet previous to this date, anyone who talked about the U.S. Government dealing in narcotics and the illegal weapons sales would have been reduced to babbling idiot status in a flash. This is an example of conspiracy theorists proven correct. There is still so much more to this story that has never been revealed to the public, that it still may be regarded as urban legend at best.

Then there is the idea of a New World Order. I can remember some twenty years ago, when anyone mentioned “New World Order”, that person (there were many of them) was pigeon holed into the lowest order of disenfranchised society had to sadly offer. At best, you were an entertaining provincial with more time on your hands than brains. Now, nearly every world leader is talking about a coming New World Order. Here is a mere sampling of direct quotes from the most diametrically opposed people on Earth, or then again, if they all are telling us what is in fact coming, and they are working together for the same ends, maybe they are NOT as diametrically opposed as we were led to believe. Let's see what some of these people have been saying while we were being told something completely different:

Arthur Schlesinger. Jr

"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money".In Foreign Affairs, July/August 1995

Adolf Hitler

“National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing a new world order".

During World War II

David Spangler

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation".

President George H. W. Bush

“Out of these troubled times, a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders”.

September 11, 1990 State of the Union

Dr. Joseph M. Goebbels

"The lie can be maintained only for such time as he State can shield he people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of he lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State".

In his diary

Mikhail Gorbachev

“We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road". 1987

"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order".

In an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

Nelson Mandela

"(The) new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all".

Philadelphia Inquirer, October 1994

New York Times

"The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund".

Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times, April 1994.

William Safire

"... it's Bush's baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler 'new order' root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier".

New York Times, February 1991.

George McGovern

"I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court".

New York Times, February 1991.

A. M. Rosenthal

"But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council". New York Times, January 1991.

President George H. W. Bush

"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long". January 1991

Brent Scocroft

"We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S./Soviet antagonisms".

August 1990, quoted in the Washington Post (May 1991).

Richard Nixon

"The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order". Foreign Affairs, October 1967.

Gov. Nelson Rockefeller

"The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able--nor can it be able--to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.' ... The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach".

In an article entitled "Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order" -- New York Times, February 1962

Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh

“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation".

Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988.M

David Rockefeller

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries".

In an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting
in June of 1991

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order”.

Robert Kennedy

"All of us will ultimately be judged on the effort we have contributed to building a NEW WORLD ORDER". 1967.

James Paul Warburg

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent".

Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950. Son of Paul Moritz Warburg

Bill Moyers

"David Rockefeller is the most conspicuous representative today of the ruling class, a multinational fraternity of men who shape the global economy and manage the flow of its capital. Rockefeller was born to it, and he has made the most of it. But what some critics see as a vast international conspiracy, he considers a circumstance of life and just another day's work... In the world of David Rockefeller it's hard to tell where business ends and politics begins".

Woodrow Wilson

"Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it".

Henry Kissinger

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government".

Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberg Conference, Evians, France, 1991

"My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order".

In address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975.

"(The New World Order) cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component".

"Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions".

Spoken at the 'World Affairs Council' Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wiltshire Hotel, April 19th 1994.

Pope John Paul II

FROM CNN ARTICLE DATED 01/01/2004: This year, John Paul directed his thoughts to continuing conflicts around the globe. But he stressed that to bring about peace, there needs to be a new respect for international law and the creation of a "new international order" based on the goals of the United Nations.

'Pope (John Paul II) Calls for a New World Order' HERE, HERE and HERE

And more quotes from Benedict XVI HERE, HERE and HERE

George Orwell

(From the novel 1984)

..."The real power, the power we have to fight for night and day, is not power over things, but over men." He paused, and for a moment assumed again his air of a schoolmaster questioning a promising pupil: "How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?"

Winston thought. "By making him suffer," he said.

"Exactly. By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in caring human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating?"

Text extract from Orwell's book '1984'

M.C. Alexander

"The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world".

Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation, 1919

What category would these same people fall under when they have denied what they have been doing all along? You could call them hypocrites and it would definitely apply, but this is a case where context must be considered. This makes these people and many, many more (drum roll please) CONSPIRATORS! That's right. This is part of the Gran Cabal. The point is, this is no longer a “theory” when it comes from the horses mouth. Those who recognise this are NOT“conspiracy theorists”. The list on this one topic of the New World Order could fill a library. The mountains of evidence is staggering, so I will put aside all the current confirmations that have flooded us since then. Since the evidence and confirmations have been let out of the bag, the MoP has apparently directed their co-conspirators in the media and Hollywood to trivialise this matter of a one world government.

They make movie's and cartoons about it. They know that an uneducated population that's given diplomas for what amounts to basket weaving will not be able to grasp the gravity of this one particular conspiracy, let alone all the others. Refer to “ignorance is bliss”, and “Ignorance is Strength”.

There are so many more conspiracies to research that it could take a person years to put enough of the pieces of the puzzle together to get a general idea about what is going on.

The point is, by definition, most everything began as a theory. These Luciferians that control the education system and the media still promote the “Theory of Evolution” as a given and a fact. A fact that is just waiting for the evidence to validate it. Hmmm.....

Maybe the key to deciphering their code. It's a conspiracy theory (despite any and all evidence) is if runs against the conspirators agenda. If this is the case, as I suspect it is, the new acceptable method of determining whether a conspiracy is a theory or not, is if it complies with the agenda makers policies.

When those who research conspiracies have to gather what information they can, there's a good chance that they will get some things wrong and there's a better chance they will get a lot more right.

This is just like police work. Can you imagine what it would be like for prosecutors to try an accused person in a court of law and despite all the evidence, the defence and judge constantly accused the prosecution of being conspiracy theorists?

So you may ask, “So all conspiracy theories are true?” This question is designed to undermine the legitimacy of the serious conspiracies. No, there a LOT of crackpot ideas out there. No, I would not take the idea that Elvis shot JFK serious. Elvis shooting JFK rates right up there with “global warming”, now changed to “climate change” because this particular conspiracy theory was proven from the same people who pushed it as a fraud (remember their e-mails were hacked and they were discovered to be lying conspirators about this), a THEORY. “Global warming” i.e. “climate change” is the perfect definition of conspiracy theory. It's a control mechanism and a huge cash cow for those who devised the idea that the building block of life (carbon) is now a poisonous pollutant. Refer to the Georgia Guidestones.

To give conspiracy theories serious attention is not an indicator of mental illness. It is to consider alternative explanations as a possibility, but ridicule is definitely an indicator of ignorance.

As a bonus, listen to the speech JFK gave on this subject on YouTube!

For sake of example, compare the Pollyanna view HERE verses the researched view HERE.